Abstract :

Teacher effectiveness is widely acknowledged as an essential influence on learner achievement; yet, the composite interplay of professional competence, personal disposition, and adaptive methodology remains underdocumented in many developing-country contexts. This qualitative case study, therefore, probed the characteristics and instructional approaches of a highly regarded English language teacher at Junior High School 2 Sungguminasa, Indonesia. Six ninety-minute lessons were videotaped and supplemented with field notes, then coded and synthesised via the Miles–Huberman interactive model. Analysis revealed nine mutually reinforcing attributes, ranging from unwavering professional commitment and disciplined time-management to creativity, motivational presence, and systematic self-reflection, that together fostered an affirming classroom climate. Pedagogically, the teacher deployed a fluid repertoire comprising Facilitator, Personal Model, Delegator, and Self-Check styles, while also introducing an emergent “Impressive/Entertaining” mode that leveraged music and humour to rejuvenate attention. This stylistic hybridity underscores the value of situational responsiveness over rigid adherence to a single paradigm. Beyond corroborating established dimensions of effective teaching, the study highlights self-reflection and affective re-engagement as under-represented yet critical contributors to sustained learner involvement. Findings invite teacher education programmes to integrate reflective practice routines and emotional intelligence training alongside methodological skills, and prompt further research into the prevalence and impact of entertaining strategies across diverse educational settings.

---

Keywords :

teaching style; facilitator approach; self-reflection; affective engagement

---

References :

1. Hanushek EA, Rivkin SG. Teacher quality. In: Hanushek EA, Machin S, Woessmann L, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol 2. Elsevier; 2006:1051-1078.
2. Nye B, Konstantopoulos S, Hedges LV. How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2004;26(3):237-257.
3. Rockoff JE. The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: evidence from panel data. Am Econ Rev. 2004;94(2):247-252.
4. Hattie J. Visible Learning. Routledge; 2009.
5. Danielson, C. Enhancing Professional Practice. ASCD; 1996.
6. Creemers BP, Kyriakides L. The dynamics of educational effectiveness: a contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Routledge; 2008.
7. Hattie J. Visible Learning. Routledge; 2009.
8. Phern CVS, Abidin MJZ. Student voice contribution in determining an effective English language teacher. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2012;66:460-469.
9. Wichadee S. Defining the effective English language teacher: students’ and teachers’ perspectives. JALT Conf Proc. 2010:50-64.
10. Ngo HX. Vietnamese learners’ perceptions of desirable teacher qualities. TESOL J. 2019;10(2):e00380.
11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge. OECD Publishing; 2015.
12. Sulaiman Personality traits of effectiveIndonesian teachers. Int J Instr. 2019;12(1):235-250.
13. Republic of Indonesia. Teacher and Lecturer Law No. 14/2005.
14. Suharti S. Examining Indonesian teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Asia Pac Educ Rev.. 2020;21(1):25–
15. Darling-Hammond L, et al. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Appl Dev Sci. 2020;24(2):97-140.
16. Grasha AF. Teaching With Style. Alliance Publishers; 1996.
17. Mosston M, Ashworth S. Teaching Physical Education. 6th ed. Benjamin Cummings; 2008.
18. Parson SA, Vaughn MG, Scales RL. Teacher adaptive expertise. Rev Educ Res. 2018;88(4):611– 645.
19. Immordino-Yang MH, Damasio A. We feel, therefore, we learn. Mind Brain Educ.2007;1(1):3-10.

20. Wanzer MB, Frymier AB. The Relationship Between Teacher Humor and Student Learning: A Communication Education Perspective. 1999;48(1):48-62.

21. Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books; 1983.
22. Ministry of Education and Culture. Permendiknas No. 35/2010: Teacher Professional Development Guidelines.
23. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Sage, 1994.
24. Andrade H, Valtcheva A. Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Pract. 2009;48(1):12-19.
25. Dewaele JM, MacIntyre PD. The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and Enjoyment in the Foreign Language Classroom. Stud Second Lang Learn Teach. 2014;4(2):237-274.
26. Gkonou C, Dewaele JM, King J. The Emotional Rollercoaster of Language Teaching. Multilingual Matters; 2020.
27. Farrell TSC. Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. Routledge; 2015.
28. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68-78.