Abstract :

This study employed a convergent mixed methods research design to determine the strategic leadership performance and experiences of school heads in integrated schools. The respondents included 188 teaching and non-teaching personnel from 15 integrated schools. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, and weighted mean, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. Career Stage 1 school heads demonstrated “very satisfactory” performance, while Career Stages 2 and 3 achieved “outstanding” performance. Their leadership practices include alignment of school vision, mission, and goals with DepEd priorities; data-driven decision-making; transparent resource management; shared leadership and governance; and collaborative school improvement culture. Challenges are overload in dual-level leadership, resource and infrastructure constraints, complexity of balancing diverse needs, administrative workload and overlapping activities, and balancing decisions with DepEd directives. The integration of the findings revealed that leadership performance increased with career stages, and strategic leadership competence develops with professional experience and leadership roles grounded on values to stronger strategic planning and implementation. These findings serve as the basis in the development of a leadership handbook. This study recommends strengthening policies, professional development, and institutional support for school heads in integrated schools.

---

Keywords :

integrated school, leadership experiences, leading strategically, convergent mixed methods, performance level

---

References :

1. Abdullah, M. R., & Arifin, I. (2024). School administrative staff: Duties and responsibilities in modern education. Proceedings Series of Educational Studies, 329–337. http://conference.um.ac.id/index.php/pses/article/download/9539/3424

2. Adangabe, A. A., & Boateng, B. (2022). Head teachers’ leadership styles and students’ academic performance in selected schools in the Ahafo-Ano South District in Ghana. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 20-29. https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/sajssh/article/view/1228

3. Agravante, M. B., Digo, G. S., & Janer, S. S. (2023). Upskilling of the school heads in the new normal. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(6), 2509-2524. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i6.4257
4. Alsalamah, A., & Callinan, C. (2021). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of training criteria to evaluate training programmes for head teachers. Education Sciences, 11(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030116

5. Balona, J. B., & Digo, G. S. (2024). Navigating the Leadership Challenges and Support System for Assistant School Principals in Senior High School. Research Studies, 4(6), 514-530. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V04I6Y2024-07
6. Barola, R. C., & Digo, G. S. (2022a). Improving school heads’ strategic leadership: A call for policymakers. Lux Veritatis, 7, 18-25.
7. Barola, R. C., & Digo, G. S. (2022b). Profile and level of performance of elementary school heads in leading strategically: Basis for the development of policy recommendations. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 12(3), 1453-1472. 23960/jpp.v12.i3.202234
8. Baker-Doyle, K. J. (2021). Transformative teachers: Teacher leadership and learning in a connected world. Harvard Education Press.
9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481
10. Buban, L. M., & Digo, G. S. (2021). Management beliefs and practices of elementary school heads on instructional leadership. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 9(7), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v9.i7.2021.4088

11. Butt, N., & Warraich, N. F. (2022). Multitasking behavior in the workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Social Research Development, 3(2), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.53664/JSRD/03-02-2022-08-229-247
12. Capulso, L. B., Salendab, F. A., Ju-im T Jimlan, G. D., Bermejo, D., Soriano, S., Rabacal, R. N., & Ramada, M. G. C. (2024). Advancing research excellence in Philippine basic education to harness productivity: A comprehensive mixed-methods approach. Migration Letters, 21(S2), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18769.95849

13. Cohen, R., & Schechter, C. (2019). Becoming an assistant principal: Mapping factors that facilitate or hinder entering the role. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 14(1), 99-112. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1218851.pdf
14. Cooke, E. D. (2023). How do school-based leaders’ perceptions of their own leadership styles impact their approach to managing and improving student discipline outcomes?(Doctoral dissertation, Saint Peter’s University). https://search.proquest.com/openview/ca8581ca057a4214cdbfe6a4ad35de7f/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
15. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/735110-studies-in-language-testing-volume-43.pdf#page=53
16. Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.
17. Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2021). Teaching and learning continuity amid and beyond the pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 6, Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.678692
18. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015: Guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the results-based performance management system (RPMS) in the Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DO_s2015_02.pdf
19. Department of Education. (2020, September 7). National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DO_s2020_024-.pdf
20. Department of Education. (2025). DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2025: Guidelines on the implementation of the expanded career progression system for teachers and school heads in the Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2025_024r.pdf
21. Elnar, E. B., Jr., & Tiongzon, B. D. (2023). Life and works of school heads in integrated public schools: A descriptive phenomenology. Department of Education, Region VII. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5272-6599 / https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3143-6875
22. Ferguson, T., & Roofe, C. G. (2020). SDG 4 in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2019-0353
23. Fraser, C., Herman, J., Elgie, S., & Childs, R. A. (2018). How school leaders search for and use evidence. Educational Research, 60(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1533791
24. Kalokora, A. M., & Lekule, C. S. (2019). Transparency in higher education human resource management: benefits and challenges. Journal of Education and Social Policy, 6(4), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.30845/jesp.v6n4p15

25. Kaur, P., Stoltzfus, J., & Yellapu, V. (2018). Descriptive statistics. International Journal of Academic Medicine, 4(1), 60-63. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_7_18

26. Kipasika, H. J. (2024). Expression of leadership mission, vision, values, and strategic objectives in academic institution development practices. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 8(1), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.59765/nywp5295

27. Lazwardi, D. (2018). Implementation of School-Based Management. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam VIII, 8(1), https://doi.org/10.24042/alidarah.v8i1.3115
28. Leechman, G., McCulla, N., & Field, L. (2019). Local school governance and school leadership: Practices, processes and pillars. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1641–1652. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2018-0401
29. Lino, A. (2018, December 26). Transformational model of management for integrated schools in the Philippines. The IAFOR Research Archive. https://papers.iafor.org/submission39299
30. Lino, A. L., & Lolinco, J. L. (2018). Transformational model of management for integrated schools in the Philippines. The International Academic Forum. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/iicehawaii2018/IICEHawaii2018_39299.pdf
31. Merenkov, A., Antonova, N., & Popova, N. G. (2019). Leadership potential of professional teacher associations in Russia: Formation of middle leaders. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.9934
32. Mncube, D. W., Ajani, O. A., Ngema, T., & Mkhasibe, R. G. (2023). Exploring the problems of limited school resources in rural schools and curriculum management. UMT Education Review, 6(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.32350/UER.62.01
33. Naparan, G., & Tulod, R. (2021). Time management strategies of school administrators towards effective administration: A phenomenological study. The New Educational Review, 63(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.21.63.1.05
34. Nguyen, H. (2022). Extended school closure: The perspectives from a rural school community (Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University). Mississippi State University Libraries. https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6406&context=td

35. Nguyễn, H. T., Hallinger, P., & Chen, C. W. (2018). Assessing and strengthening instructional leadership among primary school principals in Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(3), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-02-2017-0046
36. Oplatka, I., & Lapidot, A. (2018). Novice principals’ perceptions of their mentoring process in early career stage: the key role of mentor-protégé relations. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 50(3), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1420044
37. Parfitt, C. M., & Rose, A. L. (2020). Informal mentoring for aspiring school leaders: A phenomenological study. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 28(3), 278–294. //doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2020.1778837
38. Provinzano, K. T., Sondergeld, T. A., & Knaggs, C. M. (2020). Community schools as a sustainable comprehensive school reform strategy: A transformative mixed methods perspective. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-30. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/mwer/vol32/iss1/2
39. Puruwita, D., Jamian, L. S., & Aziz, N. A. (2022). Instructional leadership practices at high-performing vocational schools: Administrators’ vs. teachers’ perception. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 10(2), 173–185.

https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v10i2.3009

40. Riveras-León, J. C., & Tomàs-Folch, M. (2020). The organizational culture of innovative schools: The role of the principal. Journal of Educational Sciences, 21, 21-37. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1282936.pdf
41. Sahlin, S. (2025). Professional development of school principals: How do experienced school leaders make sense of their professional learning?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(2), 380-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231168235
42. Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational Research, 61(3), 257-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
43. Setia, S., Leng, P., Muliatie, Y. E., Ekowati, D., & Ratmawati, D. (2021). The principal leadership in developing inclusive education for diverse students. International Journal of Emerging Issues in Early Childhood Education (IJEIECE), 3(1), 08-24. http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/124713
44. Shaked, H. (2018). Why principals sidestep instructional leadership: The disregarded question of schools’ primary objective. Journal of School Leadership, 28(4), 517-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846180280040

45. So-Oabeb, J., & du Plessis, A. (2023). Leadership competencies for teacher professional development: Perspectives of Namibian principals, heads of departments and teachers. Perspectives in Education, 41(2), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v41i2.7097
46. Supriadi, D., Usman, H., & Jabar, C. (2021). Good school governance: An approach to principal’s decision-making quality in Indonesian vocational school. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 6(4), 796–831. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2021.4.2

47. Tekir, S. (2021). A study of early career principals’ perceptions of their induction program. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 377-404. https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.869758
48. Torres, J. L. (2025). Distributed leadership in practice: A study of collaborative school governance. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability and Excellence (IMJRISE). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15574098
49. Ullah, O., Arshad, U., & Malik, U. (2021). How do school leader implement the curriculum? Problems, prospects, and way forward. Global Educational Studies Review, 6(1), 314-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2021(VI-I).32
50. Webster, K., & Litchka, P. (2020). Planning for effective school leadership: Teachers’ perceptions of the leadership skills and ethical behaviors of school principals. Educational Planning, 27(1), 31-47. http://isep.info/educational-planning-journal
51. Yasin, B., & Mustafa, F. (2020). The correlation between school principal leadership competence and teachers’ social behaviours. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 4(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v4i1.9093
52. Zulfiqar, N. (2025). Barriers to Learning: The consequences of insufficient school resources. (SSRN No. 5278660). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5278660