Abstract :

This study focused on the instructional supervisory practices of school heads as a basis for the development of a training program. It aimed to identify the instructional supervisory practices employed by school heads; determine how these practices influence teachers’ performance and professional growth; and develop a training design that will lead to enhanced instructional supervision. The study employed a descriptive qualitative research design and utilized an interview guide for interviews with school heads and teachers. Data gathered was analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and themes. Findings revealed that instructional supervisory practices were evident but varied in implementation in all schools, resulting in differences in teacher performance and professional support. Effective practices identified included instructional monitoring, coaching, mentoring, classroom observation, and facilitation of professional learning activities, which contributed to teachers with positive impact, especially in instructional improvement and confidence. However, they lack continuous and organized professional development, which affects the effectiveness of instructional supervision. Based on the findings, researchers developed a training program entitled “Leading with Impact: Enhancing Instructional Supervision Practices for School Heads.” The study concluded that although school heads demonstrate commitment to instructional supervision, there is a strong need for a more systematic, organized, and sustainable approach to strengthen supervisory practices and improve teacher performance and instructional quality.

---

Keywords :

Instructional Supervision, Leadership Practices, Learning, and Development, Training Program

---

References :

1. Albert, J. R. G., Basillote, L. B., Alinsunurin, J. P., Vizmanos, J. F. V., Muñoz, M. S., & Hernandez, A. C. (2023). Sustainable Development Goal 4 on quality education for all: How does the Philippines fare and what needs to be done? Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.62986/dp2023.16
2. Aquino, C., Afalla, B., & Fabelico, F. (2021). Managing educational institutions: School heads’ leadership practices and teachers’ performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 10(4), 1325. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21518
3. Arrieta, G. (2021). Curriculum evaluation: Inputs for principal’s instructional leadership. International Journal of Social Learning, 1(2), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijsl.v1i2.45
4. Beach, D. M., & Reinhartz, J. (2000). Supervisory leadership: Focus on instruction. Allyn & Bacon.
5. Bell, C. A., Dobbelaer, M. J., Klette, K., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Qualities of classroom observation systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539014
6. Buban, L. M., & Digo, G. S. (2021). Management beliefs and practices of elementary school heads on instructional leadership. International Journal of Research – GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(7), 170-178.
7. Byrne, D. (2021). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y.
8. Chen, J., Li, D., & Xu, J. (2022). Sustainable development of EFL teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Situated in Multiple Learning Activity Systems. Sustainability, 14(14), 8934. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148934
9. Chin, J., Ching, G., Castillo, F., Wen, T., Huang, Y., Castillo, C., … & Trajera, S. (2022). Perspectives on the barriers to and needs of teachers’ professional development in the Philippines during COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(1), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010470
10. Collie, R. J. (2021). Teacher wellbeing and professional engagement: The role of school leadership and collaboration. Educational Psychology, 41(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1829643
11. Culajara, C. (2023). Improving teachers’ professional development through School Learning Action Cell (SLAC). Journal of Research Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 13(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol13.1.6.2023
12. Darling-Hammond, L., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers.
13. Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2018). Professional collaboration with purpose: Teacher learning toward equitable and excellent schools.
14. Department of Education. (2020). National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH) (DepEd Order No. 024, s. 2020). Department of Education.
15. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015: Guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the results-based performance management system (RPMS) in the Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2015/02/DO_s2015_02.pdf
16. DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017
    Department of Education. (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/08/11/do-42-s-2017-
17. Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 024, s. 2020: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH). Department of Education. https://naro.law.upd.edu.ph/documents/1348
18. Diano, F. and Calbi, J. (2024). School heads’ leadership styles: Impact on organizational innovativeness and performance of public elementary schools in the new normal. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 5(2), 410-425. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v5i2.944
19. Gärtner, H. (2017). Classroom observations and teacher evaluation: Methods and practices in educational supervision.
20. Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
21. Harries, I. (2024). The supervision of experienced secondary school-based counselors: A situational analysis and constructivist grounded theory exploration of best practice. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12842
22. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). ASCD.
23. Kilag, O. and Sasan, J. (2023). Unpacking the role of instructional leadership in teacher professional development. Advanced Qualitative Research, 1(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.31098/aqr.v1i1.1380
24. Kipasika, D. (2024). Instructional supervision and teacher performance in schools. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 12(2), 45–58.
25. Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Corwin Press.
26. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
27. Lualhati, G., & Karanjakwut, P. (2025). Peer coaching and teachers’ instructional performance in Philippine schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 22–36.
28. Maisyaroh, M., Wiyono, B., Hardika, H., Valdez, A., Mangorsi, S., & Canapi, S. (2021). The implementation of instructional supervision in Indonesia and the Philippines and its effect on the variation of teacher learning models and materials. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2021.1962232.
29. Montales, J. C., & Digo, G. S. (2024). Correlational study on the performance of school heads and their instructional leadership practices. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 4(3), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V04I3Y2024-05.
30. Morales, M. (2023). Practices, challenges, and perceived impact of professional development activities among senior high school teachers. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(12), 136-150. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2023.v03i12.012
31. Naparan, G. B., & Tulod, R. G. (2021). Time management strategies of school administrators towards effective administration: A phenomenological study. The New Educational Review, 63(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.21.63.1.05
32. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners: TALIS 2018 results (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
33. Pomentel, L. (2024). Exploring the influence of school heads’ instructional supervision on teachers’ efficacy and performance. International Journal of Research Publications, 148(1). https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001481520246420
34. Poortman, C. L., & Schildkamp, K. (2016). Solving student achievement problems with a data use intervention for teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.010
35. Ramadhona, A., et al. (2025). Instructional coaching and teacher professional growth: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 15(1), 55–72.
36. Republic Act No. 9155. (2001). Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2001/08/11/republic-act-no-9155/
37. Salva, R. A., Cadavedo, L. O., Cadavedo, S. V. O., & Patinga, K. T. (2023). Technology-assisted and in-person supervisory challenges in Philippine public schools: A comparative analysis. The New Educational Review, 72(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.23.72.2.11
38. 38, Schildkamp, K., & Ehren, M. (2013). From “intuitive” to “data-informed” decision-making in Dutch secondary schools? Professional Development in Education, 39(4), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.751084
39. Sibomana, I. (2020). Perceptions of teachers on the instructional leadership behaviors of secondary school principals in Rwanda. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(1), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220938365
40. Tan, C., Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2021). How school leadership practices relate to student outcomes: Insights from a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 6-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211061445
41. Tan, C., et al. (2022). Data-driven instructional supervision and teacher development in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(4), 410–425.
42. Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). Teacher evaluation policy as perceived by teachers and school leaders: Effects on professional development and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching, 23(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1287695
43. Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
44. Zain, A., Asimiran, S., Razali, A., & Ahmad, N. (2021). Coaching and mentoring as a teaching supervision approach in secondary school. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 11(4S), 98. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v11i4s.19233