Abstract :

This study examined the instructional leadership practices of secondary school head teachers as a basis for the co-design of an instructional leadership enhancement toolkit. Specifically, it aimed to determine how often head teachers demonstrate instructional leadership practices in defining the school mission, managing the instructional program, and promoting a positive school climate; describe their instructional leadership practices; and co-design an instructional leadership enhancement toolkit. The study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design with an intervention-development component. Quantitative data was gathered from 130 teachers using Hallinger’s Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS), while qualitative data was collected through interviews and focus group discussions with nine head teachers. Weighted mean, standard deviation, and thematic analysis were used in analyzing the data. Findings revealed that head teachers demonstrated instructional leadership to a very great extent across the three dimensions. Strong practices were evident in goal communication, instructional monitoring, curriculum coordination, staff participation, and recognition systems. Qualitative findings further showed that instructional leadership practices were goal-driven, data-informed, coaching-oriented, collaborative, and responsive to school contexts. The integrated findings indicate that the instructional leadership practices among secondary school head teachers is shaped by both measurable leadership practices and contextual experiences. The co-design process resulted in an enhanced instructional leadership toolkit that was practical, supportive, adaptable, and context-sensitive. The study concluded that the toolkit may serve as a useful guide for strengthening instructional leadership and school improvement efforts.

---

Keywords :

Explanatory sequential, instructional leadership practices, and instructional leadership challenges

---

References :

1. Akram, M., Kiran, S., & İlğan, A. (2017). Development and validation of instructional leadership questionnaire. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2017.60435
2. Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration,49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
3. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   https://study.sagepub.com/creswell3e
4. Hallinger, P. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10383412
5. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
6. Robinson, V. M. J. (2011). Student-centered leadership. Jossey-Bass.
   https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118269173
7. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
8. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
9. Cohen, J., et al. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213.
   https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100108
10. Leithwood, K., et al. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning.
    https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/pages/how-leadership-influences-student-learning.aspx
11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
12. Marsh, J. A., Bertrand, M., & Huguet, A. (2015). Using data to alter instructional practice: The mediating role of coaches and professional learning communities. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700411
13. Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
14. Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., Ebbeler, J., & Pieters, J. M. (2019). How school leaders can build effective data teams: Five building blocks for a new wave of data-informed decision-making. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 283–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09345-3
15. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
16. Shitana, S. S. (2018). Instructional leadership. Namibia CPD Journal for Educators. https://doi.org/10.32642/ncpdje.vi.1265
17. Bada, H. A., Ariffin, T. F. T., & Nordin, H. (2020). Teachers’ perception of principals’ instructional leadership practices in Nigeria. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4459-4469. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081013
18. Pana, E. (2024). School heads’ instructional leadership and performance: Basis for strategic leadership program. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 7(2), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.37502/ijsmr.2024.7203
19. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
20. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
21. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
22. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
23. Cohen, J., Gelberg E., Miller A., & Kelly, B. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213.
24. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2011). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
25. Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the “data-driven” mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106(1), 105–131.
26. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
27. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
28. Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003
29. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.