Abstract :

Interpretation plays a pivotal role in introducing heritage sites. It transforms a site from mere landmarks, remains, or artifacts into living meanings that impact the visitor. The interpretation process contributes effectively to the visitor’s understanding of the site’s history and culture. This understanding leads to the visitor’s awareness of the site’s cultural value and symbolism, which, then, increases the visitor’s responsibility to preserve the heritage sites, whose importance and value are realized through the interpretation process. To achieve a comprehensive interpretation process, interpretation must address several points related to the site. This study focuses on three of the most important of these points: the site’s name, its history, and its cultural significance. The study concludes that interpreting a site’s name is the gateway to understanding the site, an understanding that creates an emotional bond between the visitor and the heritage site. Interpreting the site’s history, on the other hand, connects the site’s past with its present, transforming it into a living entity that interacts with the visitor. The cultural significance of a heritage site is explained through connecting the site to identity, symbolism, and value. The study also examines the site of the Catacombs of Kom El-Shoqafa in Alexandria, Egypt, as a case study interpreting its name, history and cultural significance as a symbol of the intermingling of thoughts, beliefs, architecture, and art style of both ancient Egyptians and the culture of Greek and Roman in Egypt.

---

Keywords :

Heritage Interpretation, Toponymy, Cultural Interaction, Funerary Heritage, Heritage Values

---

References :

1. Abdallah, I. M., and N. A. Abd El-Tawab (2013). “Effects of the groundwater on deterioration of the catacombs of Kom El-Shoqafa, Alexandria, Egypt”, E Conservation, 168-181.
2. Adriani, A., e al. (1961). Repertorio d’arte dell’Egitto greco-romano (Vol. 1). L’Erma di Bretschneider.
3. Alderman, D. H. (2016). Place, naming and the interpretation of cultural landscapes. In The Routledge research companion to heritage and identity, 195-213.
4. Bibliotheca Alexandrina (2007). Kom el-Shoqafa. Alexandria: Bibliotheca Alexandrina, PDF booklet.
5. Breccia, E. (1902). Les Catacombes de Kom el-Chogafa à Alexandrie. Alexandria: Imprimerie de l’Institut Français.
6. Crooke, E. (2007). Museums and Community: Ideas, Issues and Challenges, Routledge.
7. Empereur, J-Y. (1998). Alexandria Rediscovered. London: British Museum Press.
8. Habib, L.S., Y. E. Abelwahed, and A. O. Abdallah (2024). “The Depiction of Tomb Patrons in the Tombs of Roman Egypt”, Minia Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research MJTHR, 18(1), 221-251.
9. Ham, S. H. (2013). Interpretation: Making a Difference on Purpose. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
10. Healey, J. F. (2001). The Religion of the Nabataeans: A Conspectus. Brill.
11. ICOMOS (2013). The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance.
12. Latham, E. (1904). A dictionary of names, nicknames and surnames, of persons, places and things, London & New York: Routledge.
13. Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country. Cambridge University Press.
14. McKenzie, J. (1990). The Architecture of Petra, Oxford University Press.
15. McKenzie, J. (2007). The Architecture of Alexandria and Egypt, 300 BC–AD 700. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16. Moscardo, G (1996). “Mindful visitors: Heritage and tourism”, Annals of tourism research, 23(2), 376-397.
17. Moscardo, G. (2015). Stories of people and places: Interpretation, tourism and sustainability. In The Routledge handbook of tourism and sustainability, 294-304.
18. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs.
19. Poria, Y., R. Butler, and D. Airey, (2003). “The Core of Heritage Tourism”. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 238–254.
20. Redford, D. (2001). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, Vol. 2, Oxford University Press.
21. Shaw, W. (2003). Possessors and Possessed: Museums, Archaeology, and the Visualization of History in the Late Ottoman Empire. University of California Press.
22. Silberman, N. A. (2013). “Heritage interpretation as public discourse: Towards a new paradigm”, In: Understanding Heritage: Perspectives in Heritage Studies, 21-31.
23. Silverman, H. (2002). “Touring ancient times: the present and presented past in contemporary Peru”, American anthropologist, 104(3), 881-902.
24. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of Heritage, London and New York: Routledge.
25. Tilden, F. (1957). Interpreting Our Heritage. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
26. Timothy, D. J., and S. W. Boyd (2003). Heritage Tourism. Harlow: Pearson Education.
27. Tunbridge, J. E., and G. J. Ashworth (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
28. UNESCO (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris.
29. UNESCO (2003 a). Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris.
30. UNESCO (2003 b). “Alexandria, ancient remains and the new library”, available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/1822/, Accessed on 09/08/2026.
31. Uzzell, D. (1989). Heritage Interpretation, Volume 1: The Natural and Built Environment. London: Belhaven Press.
32. Uzzell, D. (1992). Heritage Interpretation, The Visitor Experience, Wiley.
33. Venit, M. S. (2002). Monumental Tombs of Ancient Alexandria: The Theater of the Dead. Cambridge University Press.
34. Venit, M. S. (2015). Egypt as Metaphor: Visual Bilingualism in the Monumental Tombs of Ancient Alexandria. In: Visualizing the Afterlife in the Tombs of Graeco-Roman Egypt. Cambridge University Press, 50-86.