Abstract :
This descriptive-comparative study assessed the effectiveness of the Solid Waste Management (SWM) Program at Cabitan National High School. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, data were gathered from 142 Grade 9 students via a structured survey. Results showed universal awareness (100%) of the program but a significant compliance gap, with only 57.7% (“Always/Often”) participating consistently. Students displayed strongly positive environmental attitudes (Mean = 4.39) and reported positive pro-environmental behaviors (Mean = 4.34), with evidence of behavioral spillover into their home practices. A t-test revealed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in both attitudes and behaviors between consistent and inconsistent participants, supporting the role of repeated behavior in shaping internalized attitudes (Bamberg & Möser, 2007). Thematic analysis identified key benefits, Public Health and Hygiene, Aesthetic Improvement, and advanced Environmental Protection awareness, indicating the development of ecological literacy (McBride et al., 2013). The central challenge was Dependence on External Monitoring, revealing that the behavior is largely externally regulated (Deci & Ryan, 2000). The study concludes the program is successful in building awareness and positive attitudes but is limited by its reliance on external controls, highlighting a critical gap between intention and habitual action (Kollmuss & Agyeman, 2002).
Keywords :
Solid waste management, Environmental attitudes, Pro-Environmental behavior, Compliance gap, Attitude-Behavior gap, External regulation, Behavioral spillover, Education for Sustainable DevelopmentReferences :
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
- Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
- Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839908725599
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
- Eagles, P. F. J., & Demare, R. (1999). Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601875
- Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
- Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
- Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
- (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
