Abstract :

This study examined the level of students’ knowledge on flood control corruption and its implications for enhancing teaching strategies in Araling Panlipunan. The respondents were 296 Junior High School students of the University of La Salette, Incorporated. The study employed a descriptive-quantitative research design, using a researcher-constructed questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale for data collection. Findings revealed that the respondents demonstrated a sufficient level of knowledge across all indicators, including flood control concepts, corruption in flood control projects, identification of involved officials, and awareness of related laws and penalties. Overall, students showed a general understanding of flood control corruption; however, their knowledge was limited in terms of legal frameworks, governance mechanisms, and institutional processes. The study further indicates that while students are aware of real-world issues on corruption and disaster risk management, there is a need to strengthen their critical thinking and legal literacy. It emphasizes the importance of improving instructional strategies in Araling Panlipunan through the integration of real-life issues, case-based learning, and civic education to enhance engagement, understanding, and civic responsibility among learners.

---

Keywords :

Flood control, Corruption, Civic awareness, Hydrometeorological, Teaching strategies

---

References :

1. Arante, H. R., Sybingco, E., Roque, M. A., & Ambata, L. U. (2025). Sensors, 25(13), 3885. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25133885
2. Banaji, M. R., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 353–393). Wiley.
3. Bautista, V. V., & Javier, J. R. (2019). Civic education and students’ awareness of governance issues in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(2), 215–230.
4. Bolivar, M. P. R. (2017). The effects of transparency and legal accountability on corruption control. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 712–721.
5. (2026). Philippines sinks to new low in corruption perceptions index.
6. Castells, M. (2016). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
7. Dalton, R. J. (2017). The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford University Press.
8. De Guzman, A. B. (2020). Experiential learning and legal awareness among secondary students. Philippine Journal of Education, 99(1), 45–60.
9. Galtung, F. (2006). Measuring the immeasurable: Boundaries and functions of (macro) corruption indices. In C. S. Gray & D. Kaufmann (Eds.), Corruption and governance (pp. 101–130). World Bank.
10. Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2020). Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 U.S. election. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 472–480.
11. Heath, R. L., Bradshaw, J., & Miyake, Y. (2003). Risk communication and public understanding of natural hazards. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 11(4), 161–172.
12. Hoey, T. B., Tolentino, P. L. M., & David, C. P. C. (2025). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. https://hess.copernicus.org/articles/29/6181/2025/
13. Johnsøn, J., Taxell, N., & Zaum, D. (2012). Mapping evidence gaps in anti-corruption: Assessing the state of the operationally relevant evidence on donors’ actions and approaches to reducing corruption. U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre / World Bank.
14. Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2017). Educating for democracy in a partisan age. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 3–34.
15. Kohler, J. C., & Bowra, A. (2020). Exploring anti-corruption, transparency, and accountability in health systems. Globalization and Health, 16(101). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00629-5
16. Morss, R. E., Demuth, J. L., & Lazo, J. K. (2016). Communicating risk in a changing climate. Weather, Climate, and Society, 8(3), 269–281.
17. Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
18. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework. OECD Publishing.
19. Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2001). Disasters and communities: Vulnerability, resilience, and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(4), 270–277.
20. Peek, L., & Cutchin, M. P. (2010). Disasters and children: A social-environmental perspective. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(1), 1–17.
21. Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA). (2023). Climate and weather monitoring reports. Department of Science and Technology.
22. Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
23. Shaw, R., Takeuchi, Y., Fernandez, G., & Shaw, R. (2012). Disaster education. Disaster Prevention and Management, 21(1), 1–5.
24. Tejada, A. T., Sanchez, P. A. J., Faderogao, F. J. F., Gigantone, C. B., & Luyun, R. A. (2023). Atmosphere, 14(12), 1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14121790
25. (2016). Anti-corruption and governance frameworks: Strengthening accountability systems. United Nations Development Programme.
26. UNESCO & UNICEF. (2017). Education sector analysis for disaster risk reduction and resilience. UNESCO/UNICEF.
27. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org
28. United Nations. (2019). Global report on corruption and youth engagement. United Nations.
29. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2021). Flood control and stormwater management.https://www.epa.gov
30. UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies. (2025). Flood-control fiasco: A policy reckoning for accountability in the Philippines.
31. Waisbord, S. (2018). The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice, 4(1), 17–34.
32. World Bank. (2020). Helping countries combat corruption: The role of the World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org
33. Zhang, X., et al. (2019).